Really?


[ Replies to this Post ] [ Post a Reply ] [ Academic Board ]

Posted by Commentator on November 14, 2006 at 10:08:22

In Reply to: Re: I have some misgivings about your details posted by another answer on November 13, 2006 at 13:53:05:

'Ban the Bomb' only de-emphasized mass partner swopping at NAFs and GAFs. It was just not to be a highlight on the program, but it didn't remove the option. That's what lawful vs expedient really means when you decode TF's PR terminology. Inter-home sex and meeting up for sex during meetings continued to happen well past 1983, all the way into the 90s, and according to prevalent testimony it has never actually stopped. Come-unions continued to happen, as an option. It just stopped being glorified in print and literature. As someone on the inside you must know this to be true.




Replies to this Post:



Post a Reply



[ Replies to this Post ] [ Post a Reply ] [ Academic Board ]