Posted by Rpost on February 02, 2014 at 13:24:26
In Reply to: Re: Another perspective posted by Just Sayin' on February 02, 2014 at 05:32:10:
I have seen similarly written statements by excellent writers who are not lawyers but are equally persuasive.
I would not exonerate Allen neither would I accuse him but I would be much more inclined to favor the testimony of a child. More so when the scandal did not gradually went public but as an explosion, suddenly and loudly.
There are many reasons why the issue did not get coverage, and the influence of WA in the "arts" is enough, as this writer himself suggests. WA has any people by the balls, so to speak, through his contacts all over the place. This writer, even though he may not have receive money, enjoys a degree of access that in many cases is more valuable than money. Shame on him for selling his soul.
Replies to this Post:
Post a Reply