In Reply to: Re: Everything has limitations, esp. legalistic minutiae posted by CB on April 28, 2010 at 16:29:39:
...your sexual preferences are "your thing" in as much God ,seems to me, has given us some liberties to choose...sexual practices IMO belong to that as well (how much is inherited/inborn/genetical...I am not sure)...you can take that argument up against and with God...to make it plain: I have no authority to call you whatever...names...etc...it's a board...free speech in it's known limitations...however...you're also "judged", dear CB how you defend your preferences...I think I can challenge about any Bible authority about the theme divorce and remarriage; I collected enough fodder on the line of my search...have you too regarding homosexuality??It's about following Jesus...staying apart/holiness...and 1.Cor. 6 e.g. is a severe warning..it shook me up 6 years ago...the paper of Mel.W. appears very weak and I say that because I studied 100eds of websites regarding divorce and remarriage...have a book about the topic:views from the early church fathers...linguistic approach as well...plus several books...I did my research...if you did as well, then you can produce may be more links than the one of Mel W.??
I am not illogical...cheap shot..I am reasonable..within the boundaries of reasonings of some medical circles/opinions
Some of your arguments are illogical. Following your line of reasoning about the distastefulness and dangers of anal sex, it's not OK for a heterosexual couple to engage in anal intercourse. Why would that be sinful if they're married and each partner consents and agrees it is pleasurable? The Bible says nothing about this form of genital contact between man and wife. The Bible does, however, condemn intercourse while the woman is menstruating. Are you using that as an argument against all forms of "unsanitary" and potentially harmful sex between married couples?
You guessed it right...I never practiced it myself...my colleagues would talk about the wrong tube/exhaust-pipe...if you know what I mean...they are as direct in their wording/communication as you can get...which is "fascinating" often enough...sex is fun...that's why men want is badly...woman allow it (orgasm-limitations renders often less fun to them or sometimes they have rather more fun)...and the wanted result are more human beings...I believe God intended it that way but not to just gratify our lusts...difficult as that is..I know...
(plus having for the children the right surrounding/upbringing...family bounds...not like TF)
Therefore I am pro creation..always have been as a believer and would say...it's the wrong tube..ok??
consider Romans 1:25,26 in the Romans 1 debate ...rather serving/worshipping the creature/creation...than the creator...that's what sex is often about...or the worldly pleasures forgetting about the creator and His intentions for us...