It's unfortunately the second time I remember, that you complained about me and my style being unclear...though others did in the past, it kind of got rectified with others...it seemed to me
I realise, I might not be deep, just muddy and unclear...however you as someone holding a PhD I consider it...sorry...just being a bit "lazy"...sorry, again...to want to have it all on the silver platter.(Also you must be skilled enough, to get the gist of things...if you don't know in an equation you can nevertheless often deduce it from the rest...or not, plus, you never bothered to ask some clarifying questions...why not???)
In an analogy:
You want someone in a short post to explain to you the incompleteness theorem??That's be laughable...you and I know that.
I don't think I'd manage to understand the full proof in my lifetime...even if someone used up all the bandwidth here.It takes time and energy and both sides.IT's enough for me to know, that the proof is there and accepted and to realise some of it's implications for the scientific world or thinking in general.
Bottom-line, if you engage in a simply put very deep matter...in analogy venturing out with your swimming far from the safe beach, ..you cannot expect, that everything gets safe and clear in a moment.
There are plenty of books and PDFs on most subjects out...
Some expect the labour to be done for them...
I almost suspect, you're one of them....sorry, my critique.
So why you start a dialogue/post/theme/thread and leave it there...just beats me, are you still coming up with something or not??