Re: Back to 3:16

Posted by Farmer on June 30, 2010 at 15:02:24

In Reply to: Re: Back to 3:16 posted by Pastor Don on June 30, 2010 at 12:35:58:

I agree to your feedback...we had recently the OSAS debate (re)started here (TF being among the ones who push the doctrine...may be more than others)...may be you know the conditional security side...I think it's among many Dan Corner...who stands for it...I am right now delving again into Hebrews 6 and 10 etc.

Point being, what I also noticed and people like Dan emphasize...the eternal security verbs of believing are mostly in the present tense (continous implication) not the Aorist...kind of one time saying yes Lord...if you know what I mean...

Huge subject...but like I said to OT2, as long as we still believe and don't have huge sins accumulated like TF (greetings from 1.Cor.6)...doing some good...ready to repent...I figure their is personal hope...

Just my little comment