Mixing things up

Posted by Observer on September 09, 2003 at 18:56:17

In Reply to: Commentay on "The Girl Who Wouldn't" posted by Alan on September 09, 2003 at 12:36:23:

"This letter was nothing less than the green light for wide-scale sexual coercion in the fam. It is so outrageous that the family's official web site
has the unmitigated gall to display their "fundamental Family Rules." In this document, they falsely assure the world that sexual coercion will not be tolerated, and that all sexual activities are to be mutually consensual."

You jumped from a letter that was written in 1978, to the Family web site's PR material which was written some 20 plus years later, which was based on the Family Charter, which was written and amended as a direct result of the London court case of 1995, and you ignore all facts and developments in between.

Have you read up about these events yet? They are on this sites articles section or on several other sites such as movingon.org.
With this string of events in mind, you can perhaps understand that the current Family spin is they are maturing as a movement, and do not endorse sexual coercion today.

Have you read the article on this site, Peter Amserdam's Admission of guilt?