In Reply to: Re: Interesting article, Susie posted by MG on February 28, 2004 at 01:08:55:
Here is a portion of what I wrote:
"Jung poses some interesting questions concerning Job and the nature of God. I have my own questions about the whys and wherefores of what happened to Job,
but I disagree with some of Jung's conclusions/assumptions regarding the nature of God. His assertion that God considered Job's morality to be superior
to his own is pretty far-fetched, and he clearly didn't understand the purpose of God becoming human in the form of Christ."
As you can see, I did not say Jung was far-fetched, I said that one of his conclusions was far-fetched. This is not a minor distinction. I am simply offering my honest opinion and analysis of some of Jung's assumptions regarding the nature of God. If I were truly closed-minded, I wouldn't have even bothered to read Susie's post. Furthermore, I read a fair amount of Jung during my psychology classes at college, so I'm not a stranger to his philosophy. I wonder if you are open-minded enough or objective enough to read anything that contradicts Jung?