well,

Posted by ray on April 13, 2004 at 14:36:51

In Reply to: Re: "sin".. posted by Acheick on April 13, 2004 at 06:59:44:

i guess that is just my sin nature acting up again...

altho i guess i can see how you might interpret it as flippant, but it honestly was intended to convey the thought that sg's initial exposure to jesus was indeed very unfortunate (unlucky) and i do hope he (or she?) will be more fortunate (lucky) in any future interactions w/ expressions of faith. i do not share "my experiences" as a template for anyone to follow. but it would be dishonest of me not to express my heartfelt beliefs, as just that, my beliefs. if i heartily recommend the trustworthiness of christ, i do it as a very poor representative of the way. i am one of those followers "whose cheese is always falling of my cracker" as brennan manning puts it. you won't catch me quoting paul, "be ye followers of me.." yikes. that is not only scary, but ridiculous.

sorry for any arrogance, or ambiguous choice of words.