In Reply to: Re: What I don't understand(is understood by someone) posted by Farmer on July 15, 2004 at 02:41:46:
'I guess, somewhere that natural love got "killed"'
I'd say that we yielded our individualistic side at some point and adopted the group thought. I am leery of "establishing something by the mouth of many witnesses" because it can lead to the same situation of group think. My approach is to remain skeptical to the nth degreee and go against the current in many cases. I will either remain as an outsider or I will take a stand but I have to feel that I have enough information on the matter. If new information comes around I try to see how it fits with everything else I know about it.
I think skepticism is gold in cases like this. There are only a few things that I am certain of and the rest I doubt until there is a revelation telling me one way or another. This attitude has not prevented me from completing with all my might what is on my list of priorities.
As a single person in TF I put away doubts about Davidito, etc. but once I had children I could not allow my children to be exploted or treated in the way I saw coming. Revelation took over and in spite of peer pressure I moved on to protect my children. I chose not to kill "natural love" the only way I could.
I suspect some people in WS homes and other chosen units may have been able to keep their children too, at least close by.