a clarification

Posted by Acheick on July 16, 2004 at 17:53:25

In Reply to: Re: then... posted by Miguel on July 16, 2004 at 15:29:17:

This is the "doom" I was talking about:

"It was a great need but it will be a pitty that it turns out to be just like the old Crossfire used to be."

and you are not the first or only one that has made this connection and this type of statement. It just irks me because I don't see the connection or even the need to bring it up. I don't see this site as being anything like that or worrying that it will turn into that. Maybe you do, but I don't. It seems to me to be a rather negative way of looking at things. If that is offensive to you that it irks me and that it feels negative to me, I profusely apologize. It has absolutely nothing to do with your political stance.

Also, my involvement in this conversation has nothing to do with mine or your politics so please don't equate the two. Every once in awhile I am involved in the machinations of this site, so I was speaking from that vantage point. However, I am only one little voice that means nothing to most people, so don't let it worry you.