In Reply to: More from 'National Geographic' posted by :c} on March 26, 2005 at 15:16:36:
OK, now I've read it.
It clearly states that it is a fossil "seventy million years old" but preserved in a way they have never seen before (compared to chicken in vineger, for example."
This is very exiting, because it confirms the theory that birds are descended from dinosuars.
That's what the article says, and it is very interesting, but it hardly discredits th theory of evolution (the tissue looked very similer to that of an ostrich.)
There is nothing about it being only ten thousand years old.