In Reply to: 'Da Vinci Code' on Wikipedia posted by Observer on April 24, 2006 at 23:40:31:
Some better critiques (for FYI purposes):
http://www.jesusanddavinci.com/
http://www.jesusanddavinci.com/theology/crashdavincicode.html#Question_12
http://www.jesusanddavinci.com/theology/crashdavincicode.html#Question_5
http://www.jesusanddavinci.com/theology/crashdavincicode.html#Question_11
http://www.jesusanddavinci.com/theology/crashdavincicode.html#Question_8
http://www.leaderu.com/offices/rusty_wright/newtestament.html
http://www.jesusanddavinci.com/theology/davinci_faq.html
http://www.jesusanddavinci.com/theology/crashdavincicode.html
http://www.leaderu.com/theology/maryandjesus.html
http://www.jesusanddavinci.com/theology/wasjesusmarried.html
http://www.jesusanddavinci.com/popculture/dismantlingdavinci.html
http://www.nbctexas.org/media/davinci.htm
Other interesting related subjects:
http://www.reinventingjesus.info/
http://www.faithdefenders.com/ministry/articles/apologetics/book_reviews/To+Everyone+an+Answer+Review.htm
Later!
Boy! There surely has abeen a "dearth" of posting in the last week or so--how come; I wonder?
Sincerely,
OT2 (OldtimerToo)