In Reply to: Has anybody else heard of this? (NT) posted by Observer on July 08, 2006 at 03:04:27:
IMO I think the basic premise of string theory has to do with fractile dynamics, how the smallest known molecular particles behave and therefore influence our reality plane(s). It is my understanding that relativity proposes it is not possible for anything other than light to travel at light speed. Any other particle's very aquisition of mass under acceleration would not allow for sufficient drive to achieve light speed.
String theory, as I understand it, is still developing but is based on the premise that at very small subatomic particle levels reality planes (actuality), or probability (predicted real result) for particle groups,(matter) may have multiple sametime outcomes for same or same sets of particles. This implies that the nature of real time outcomes for a same particle group event manifests more than one eventuality in the very tiny world of sub,sub,sub atomic particles. Whether there are 11 planes or more in string theory the heart of it for me is that it seems the existance of multiple real time outcomes for the same particle will still be subject to relativity as the particles combine to a sufficient mass/form to impact on the real time world we live in. It seems reasonable to me to asume, if string theory is viable, that multiple same time outcome variability for sub,sub,sub particles occurs at extremely fast rates. So fast in fact, that in real time they appear to be happening all at once. Is it possible that our ability to discover or impliment the math that reveals the actual space between these particle outcomes is not yet developed? Like we see fluid movement on the screen while watching a film because our physical senses cannot readily distinquish the individual picture frames at the speed they are projected. I think we are still at the jerky part of string theory development like the first "moving" pictures.
Just my viewpoint
Sincerely Rocky