In Reply to: Re: Faith, Reason, God and Other Imponderables posted by Mr. Don on July 25, 2006 at 18:55:18:
MS:
If you ever want to make an attempt to actually discuss the topic, there are several of us who would be glad to respectfully oblige you in the topics of what actual empirical science is and is not, what honest philosophy is and is not, what science itself done properly ies and is not, and what the religious viewpoint of rationalist materialist atheism is, and is not.
I really have to say that nearly every one of your posts on the subjects I've touched on are made within a very disrespectful, angry, accusative, and boringly dogmatic narrow focus; in my own opinion.
Do you ever read and attempt to analyze what you write, before you actually post it? I recommend it; sincerely. You actuall strike me as someone who has become what you hate--TF hurt you, as it hurt all of us. You hate condescending preaching, self-rigteousness, groundless dogma, and hatred of others, but I must honestly say that you do exhibit those qualities as well.
I am not being unfairly accusative, here, and I am not at all angry with you--but you do seem to insist on a philosophical unfairness that favors you alone.
We get that you are a dogmatic atheist, and that you assume that massive evidence exists for solely your own point of view.
I say there does not, and would gladly engage you here, or by private email, if I could possibly help.
Just about everything you have written is extremely predictable, and quite insulting to the inteeligence of most of those who do not agree with the anti-faith part of your life's journey, that you have chosen to endlessly regale us with.
Your approach never varies.
Do you want to discuss anything intelligent; or not? I mean that in the kindest way possible; serously. Choosing atheism doesn't give you a separate set of rules for dialogue from the rest of us; know what I mean?
Respectfully,
OT2