In Reply to: Re: Church Article on Pedophelia posted by CB on August 15, 2006 at 12:37:07:
CB:
Since all or most of the academic lit on sex, from (yecch! ptoo-ie!) the Kinsey report on human sexuality is such a load of perverted unscientific crap (his "researchers" actually caused infants physical and emotional harm BY MASTURBATING THEM, for VERY long periods of time!), I'm fairly far removed by now, and burnt out on, the whole psych industry, in that area..
I barely have any more respect in that area for MOST of the so-called "professionals" than I have for TF. Shee-IT!
By getting the child desensitized to natural shyness and decorum, and used to the idea of "on-demand self-willed orgasms at ANY cost", as they are forced into too-early development, the first place they "touch" them is in their little God-given consciences, and in the violation of the conscience in "looking on the nakedness" of "close kinsmen", etc., which the Bible condemns as an abomination and a confusion; which it IS, no mater WHOM that idea "hairlips".
MT 5:28 denotes the priciple of "looking on to lust after", and "covetousness is idolatry", so that the visualization process, slowly perverted in these poor children by their elder TFer counterparts, IS a form of idolatry.
And, the idea of "being one flesh with" anyone you have sex with, or lust after WANTING to have sex with, icluding a demon masquerading as a "false Christ", which is TF's stock in trade, will have the predictable effect; demonic bondage insuring capitulation to Maria, the "pervert queen of the damned".
In effect, the same thing as "touching"; only WORSE!
OT2