Re: Was that to me or skeptic?

Posted by on October 03, 2006 at 18:37:53

In Reply to: Was that to me or skeptic? posted by Roger on October 03, 2006 at 13:38:00:

Roger:

Oops!

I gotta plead "brain fart" on that one. I was answering skeptic, and clisked on the wrong post--my bad.

I still say, in response to your "NO coming to Journeys to "witness" (to me a revisionist trem in that particular usahge), that that SPECIFICALLY "ghetto-izes" "still Christian" exers, and would be wrong, acordint to the Onwer/Operator; WC, especially in light of his recent statemenets on the purposes and history of ExFam as HE designed it, versus how it BECAME, which is WHY he said he had to retune the rules, to exclude No ONE!

The real problem is either people insisting on being mean, ugly and rude to one another, or the avoidance of answering direct questions in favor of PROFOUND self-pity and very "posed" crocodile tears" in favor of their position (usually a veiled political one, at that), and unfair accusations all around. Whew! Enough already!

I personally think we CAN get along, if we try.

OT2