Posted by Coordinator on January 25, 2012 at 05:38:27
As mentioned before, exFamily.org will not be facilitating or responding to your back-and-forth exchanges (forum or email) whereby you slip in digs, employ vague censures and insinuations. We do our best to be as transparent as we can afford and we communicate plainly about our policies. Kindly read the responses we have given you, (such as ) in whole and not in part--you've been cherry-picking single sentences and wasting our time trying to create faux issues around these.
If you wish to contribute on our boards, please abide by our rules and guidelines, and respect what this site is about. However, if you feel that you should not or cannot be required to establish your own credibility, or that showing where you are coming from is a pointless exercise, or farcical, or resembles a cult, etc., then virtual communities are really not your thing.
From the onset you have pushed to be as indeterminable as possible and have proposed that it is impossible to quantify and gauge "what is an ex-member" and that this is some form of (in my words) "reverse cultism." We happen to feel differently. We take the stance that people who have left should say so plainly and "act" so, because we are biased and most in favor of ex-members who have left the cult behind in body, mind and spirit. Although everyone processes his/her exit differently, we have never favored any para-COGs or half-in-half-outs, and certain traits are common to and identifiable in people who have genuinely left.
You are welcome to use our boards, if you actually discuss something and communicate with the world at large with outbound content.