Posted by Thinker on September 30, 2012 at 13:37:38
In Reply to: Re: The TF sex story in a nutshell - my take posted by FH on September 30, 2012 at 13:23:07:
Let me get this straight. You find the speculations of a "poet" whose sole academic qualifications are the Classics, dabbling in armchair psychology and making wild conjecture about what constitutes derivable data from neurobiological research, who advocates exploring behavior modification to create a Utopian society through hook ups into electrical brain devices, who decides what all lab rats "know," who asserts that the only reason we have crime and imperfection in society is due to a conspiracy of law enforcement and big pharma to protect their jobs and income, who compares porn addiction with crack addiction, who is a proponent of thought policing and assumes her views of morality are universal, who gives no proper references for her "quotes" and supposedly supported conclusions other than general, highly nonspecific wikipedia articles, who makes a considerable number of sweeping statements and cross-discipline generalizations on unassociated data and theories that have no established basis for association, who liberally uses hyperbole to support her statements and calls it all a defensible "thesis" ... interesting?
This is extremely muddled thinking, to put it mildly. I for one, won't be taking her seriously anytime soon. I edit theses as part of my job and if I had run across her writing in the course of my work, I would be laughing out loud and wondering if it was a joke and if there was a hidden cam somewhere.