Posted by Farmer on December 27, 2011 at 03:22:27
In Reply to: Re: I can relate posted by long time exer on December 26, 2011 at 17:45:33:
"If you ever slept with someone under age, even if they asked you to and "wanted it", your responsibility as an adult would be to get help for them and not engage in sexual activity with them, period."
I said so in my maaaaaany posts here on board...that it never happened (are you thick/dense?/no time to search and read my posts...YOUR fault!!!!)...I said so that I had in India been roomed in a tiny room...sufficient though for 2 beds...hope you don't misread two here...two means two...get it??......and the shepherd said...it'd be ok if I'd shared with her...me never even insinuating it/thinking it to be right etc. etc....next I never ever made any advances to her, sex, intimacy never entered...next we nonetheless got along fine me and the British teenager of 15 years of age...if you have too wild an imagination...you're just a plain accuser...and sorry to say...you become a bit stupid off here of late...simply you try to shove some picture in here of me, which never existed and you don't seem to like that.
Picture of you seems to be...all men are a bit strange ...if not weird...and if you're the same person, having posted here before in Jules time...then the outcome for you was, as far as personal intimacy is concerned/partnership...that you opted for female homosexuality.
Point is I had shared with female adults in TFI or out of TFI "only"...as if that wasn't bad enough, out of wedlock, as I was still single then...but wait, right...you're not religious anymore.
"However, I've read posts of yours where you seem to indicate you never saw any number of travesties that happened within the family, but in reality, if you read about it in the lit, then you SAW it"
...obviously meant from the context is seen "in vivo"...
You know LTE...you begin to bore and upset me at the same time...boring...because all these points were previously addressed by me over the years, but you have no time, right?...to read it...upsetting, because you want to pin the fault...gosh...lady...you have seen it too..point...bingo...and seen which pictures pls....meaning the Davidito-book?....(also that book didn't interest me that much....as I was still single...and childcare really wasn't my foremost interest).So I only remember one picture of Davidito with kind of erected penis as a child...I think it had to do with circumcision...I've heard, that there exist two versions of the book or so...one more sanitized...without the childcare-helper in abuse position...I never saw that...And I was circumcised with 12, and if you know that much about men...circumcision is even now performed for health-reasons in Africa, to stem the AIDS-tide...it's cheaper and effective.Overall circumcision can be a must in a boy's life...and I found out about it myself through a teen-magazine...sometimes parents are not that big of a help.Frankly love-up time in the Dito or childcare books didn't mean that much to me either at that time.How am I supposed to know what love is always meant....you expect everyone of the FGAs to make the same connotations if they read that abuse-drivel....for me sex and children made no sense...Berg gave himself the hint, that sex is for procreation...You know what, before I was attracted to by the ISCON...Hare Krsna guys and may be you know that much about them...sex is entirely about procreation for them...in a way I was conditioned about all that...and I was scared stiff of a pregnancy out of wedlock...I believed...love-romance...partnership had to be of the same mold...and I still think so and stronger than ever...only, that for me personally it is too late, I remain single on purpose... but I am very vocal about it...especially towards my children..yeah...virtues you snug about? like in Bollywood portrayed...
Oh and my responsibility was to get help?Yeah..in the ideal case of someone being so enlightened, like e.g. you right?!Good for you!!!!My respect...seriously.
...point is...I was deluded...and first step would have been to get entirely out...and that was then not the case in the mid-eighties...I think you don't get it.Yardstick is you, yourself...your self-righteousness.Getting help in India...yes...pls. dream on.
I posted here something about European politician Daniel Cohn Bendit...that he described in a book
about his early wild 60-"revolution"-years...how he had worked in a kindergarden...and that children supposedly opened his pants and so forth and so forth...hard to believe...but later he ho-hummed about it...saying that is not meant literal...but some figure of speech and blah, blah...so whenever you're rattling...dear LTE...don't forget, there are tons of more people having dirt on their fingers...and when I hint at it here how wordly/fleshly...not at all spiritual TFI has been all the time...well, I get even flak for that on the board.
Point is me, you and all the others have "seen" it then as well...proving my point...that was all the time toxic enough...especially with the word mixed in....I...we were deluded...false ideals...mind-trip...trapping into it ourselves...the mind getting eased about something it shouldn't have gotten eased about, rather alerted...plus "too busy" witnessing...endtime...system baaad...etc. etc.
I gave you some hints why we stayed nonetheless, but you won't have any of it...
I copy now this and other posts...because you and other readers are too lazy to read other posts...so that I would have to repeat, what I already said...shame on you....we also have a wordly job to do...never occurred to you??...that I also have other interests??...gosh...
Now pls go on again, that I haven't understood you...endless loop...byeeeeeee
Replies to this Post:
Post a Reply