Posted by Perry on July 28, 2012 at 18:08:46
In Reply to: Re: New article from the UK on Juliana Buhring's bike around the world posted by sankharadukkha on July 17, 2012 at 12:38:20:
"Is it possible you're being just a tiny bit dogmatic?"
This was my counterclaim to Juliana's claim about TFI: "Imo, TFI is not just another loosely organized Christian network." I then explained why I think that.
How is that being dogmatic?
Please point out the dogma in my comment. Do you think I am dogmatic merely for having a different opinion than Juliana? Do you think I should think exactly like her?
The rest of my comment expressed opinions, not dogma, and not in a dogmatic way. To say that I will never believe anything anyone associated with TFI in anyway has to say until certain conditions are met is not being dogmatic or hyperbolic, it is being completely rational given the deceptions that lie at the heart of TFI's entire existence.
Replies to this Post:
Post a Reply