In Reply to: Farmer's ad hominem arguments posted by BB on June 28, 2007 at 16:43:57:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
Well...your posts are free of ad hominem attacks.It would be wise not to call the kettle black...I sure used ad hominem attacks...because should I argue with long windeded theology about what you disbelief anyway.I could try, if I have the time...but there plenty of books about all that...so wouldn't invent the wheel anew.Your arguments are found among those of emperor Julian also Celsus etc....so are they new.NoBut also the response to what you bring up as Oh so new...isn't new either.
I get the "vibes", that you have something in common with Perry...but never mind...welcome to the board & as I have time I'll answer to the "Substance"...moral defects in Jesus...how about (if he ever existed...you had to add).
Your ad Christum-attacks are also very very personal to me...you seem to forget that.
You never replied though to questions I asked directly or indirectly.Is that the penchant you have?Avoiding to answer questions???
(Hint: messianic prephecies...another about scepticism....another )
That you just quoted what you like about Hitler, doesn't show, that you're very outbalanced in your arguments.So how can I trust that in a further dialogue, you want to be fair enough?Right now you just turn around & harp at the ad hominem attacks, giving no reaction to the substance.Makes me wonder, whether you can only have a dialogue, if it's presented in the nicest way, whereas you feel free to attack the treasured faith of mine...it happens to be indirectly ad hominem too.
You called my light darkness...no ad hominem...should I list all of your "faults"??
You mind??