The Family Children of God by insidersChildren of God Family International
Home Chat Boards Articles COG History COG Publications People Resources Search site map
exFamily.org > chatboards > genX > archives > post #1460

The F. has not changed

Posted by Repost from MG on June 11, 2002 at 22:14:58:

Posted By: MG
Date: Tuesday, 11 June 2002, at 12:16 p.m.

In Response To: They haven't stopped sexual immorality ask MG (lydia)

I'm thinking of a particular, small, poor country, a great mission field, and of some national family members, male, who are young, some single, some married with new young families. I'm also am reminded of young, SGA, Family girls, with no attraction at all to the men in question, who have come to this field to be missionaries to the needy people. In the name of Zerby's almighty Law of Love sharing, referred to on a regular basis as being needed, helpful, unifying, the Family's uniqueness, and on and on... I've seen young women not being able to say no to the men who desired regular sex with them. In the name of the blessings of the Law of Love and sharing. To me that is immorality. They can't say no, because then they are made to feel that they're not loving, unselfish, and bound. And usually there's no romance to it either. Even between the singles.

How do I know?..... Lots of times Family young people confided in me and my wife. I think some young people wanted to share their feelings with us because my wife and I were a rarity. We had celebrated our 25th aniversery in 1998. We had never been apart at any time in our marriage. (We were never leaders either--TG for that! For the sake of God knows what, every leadership couple I ever knew had separated.) Not to say that we never shared with others when we were younger, but as the years went by we did not desire it any more. That Sept 1998 Law of Love series and sharing re-vitalization did not appeal to us. So young SGA girls would confide in us how they felt, and on several occasion we had a young SGA girl asking us to help them to get out of situation where they felt compelled to have to relieve a horny Family man who was after their ass. I don't using that language but it was pure sex, pure lust, and nothing to do with love or furthering the blessings of the Kingdom of God. It is done in the name of the many beatitudes that is ascribed to it in the Family publications. But at ground zero, on many oaccasions, it's just jo blow getting hot for some cunt. The perks for his perked up dick. And it's easy street, because the path to this glory has been paved clear by Zerby's dictums. How moral is that!