|
In Reply to: Re: archi... posted by in the archive on December 10, 2002 at 18:33:49:
it was not good works i was getting at, but how completely off the point the timeline stuff was. to me that is just clouding up the issue w/ ad hominem arguments. the point of my (slightly muddled)timeline was to establish i did not have a "smoking gun" in my file cabinet that could somehow bring the family down that i was holding out to protect myself. heck, it seems like achiek knew way more than i did. but even if i had known, i can't say w/ any certainty that i would have intervened. i don't know. i was slipping badly by 1990..but that all is besides the point of whether i should be excluded from the conversation. and that is why my question...what did your post have to do w/ the thread or "the cause"? but anyway...on w/ life. amen.
