In Reply to: it is not the same Peter at all Joshua posted by lydia on March 23, 2003 at 11:50:50:
seems to be a misunderstanding, but there are good grounds for Reader being so jumpy, but we will not dig up the details for now, as this was in the past.
Reader, thank you for your heads up. We have looked into the info.
PP, we apologise if this has offended you.