The Family Children of God by insidersChildren of God Family International
Home Chat Boards Articles COG History COG Publications People Resources Search site map
exFamily.org > chatboards > genX > archives > post #9115

Re: What's in a name?

Posted by Sam Ajemian on August 05, 2003 at 14:19:46

In Reply to: Re: What's in a name? posted by Sam Ajemian on August 04, 2003 at 15:40:02:

I was looking at the mulitude of young people in the pictures on the CVC website. Since about age 15 has been the age when young people where encouraged to have sex and babies and since the group is over 30 years old, maybe what we see in some of these pictures are members of the third generation! Are they, when they come out, going to start their own independent activist group, accusing first and second generation exmembers for abusing them or not protecting them from LJ starting from age 14, ffing (?), sharing at age 14, vd, siblings from different parents, unknown parents, or parents they never met, for not protecting them from the insanity of letters like Go for Gold?? I am actually answering a post where the question is raised as what is wrong in the Family the last eight years. These thousands of kids (10,1000 according to a recent post) even without any of the things I mentioned above are been indocrinated to accept the Law of Love. The young members can put two and two together and figure out that Zerby couldn't go from the point where she was concerned the Family's public lying denials would make kids think they were against child adult sexual interaction to the point where she now is against all that. They can see if they have any thinking abilities at all that Zerby pretended it was all a communication problem and a misunderstanding and the group never intended that there be child adult sexual interaction. Though incest and child adult sex, child prostitution is now abondoned (thought it may still be going on in the inner curcles)all of this is part of the law of love, their cardinal doctrine. (This is why all their apologies are so meaningless). What is wrong with the Family the last eight years, or the last eight months or the last eight days is that they still very much believe all these things are within the perimeters of what the Law of Love allows, though they only practice part of all that. (sharing, LJ). The point is that they have not changed. Their stopping some things under the point of a gun is no change whatsoever. So looking at all these children in the Family Websites the problem is not only that they will share at age 14 or Love Jesus at age 14 but that they are indoctrinated in believing the Law of Love and all that that implies. I got to run, don't have the time to check what I wrote. Hope didn't make too many mistakes. Sam AJemian