In Reply to: Re: HERE'S THE TRUTH posted by Joseph on September 08, 2003 at 11:21:55:
One point I forgot to address in my reply to Acheick:
"correspond or write to him unless they wanted it to be public. If you write a letter to the editor, it's the same and you have to use a real email address and real legal name. Whatever you write, becomes their property. I realize our subject is a lot more sensitive, but Sam is no priest to confess to. He's on a mission and if you don't want to be a part of that mission, don't talk to him."
I modified my behavior after that situation transpired. I no longer engage Sam in any type of private conversation. If I have something to say to him, I do it in public on the boards.
Sam has not modified his behavior. He has justified it over and over again. He continues to take information, throw it at the wall, and watch to see what sticks. He handles information in an irresponsible manner, and he has not attempted to improve his methods. He believes that his methods are totally sound.
As far as using Sam as a Priest to confess to. That never happened. Sam posted a message on this board from someone your organization had banned from posting. I contacted Sam as a courtesy to inform him of some information he could not possibly be aware of, that should have made him think twice about posting info on behalf of that particular individual.
Regarding my claim that certain people treat Sam in a special manner. Did anyone from this board ever inform him that he should not post messages on behalf of banned individuals? Or was everyone too busy trying to figure out how to blame me for that whole thing?