|
In Reply to: Re: I don't think so, Charlie posted by Acheick on November 02, 2003 at 11:56:50:
That's true, the lines were crossed. But then again, a part of the doctrine was, "When sin is not sin!" - go figure! I wonder if, in her case, it is, or was, desparate dependence and if the health issues are anger turned inwards. Can you say why she keeps the madness going and why she has Berg sitting at the right hand of God Himself? I mean, there has to be some delusion, something psychologically disturbing, going on, don't you think?
