|
In Reply to: Hello!?! posted by Always Had Her Number on November 03, 2003 at 20:44:27:
I think, if I'm not mistaken (could be though) that it was he who interpreted what she would prophecy in tongues, meaning he could interpret anything to suit his fancy, and say it was the Lord, meaning manipulate her into anything and "voila", she's caught in the snare of doctrine ala Berg, like we were. All that, "thus saith the Lord" and "as sure as I've ever heard the voice of the Lord" stuff - it was all him. You and I both know that it was he teaching her (and us). She published nothing, herself, for years. In fact, I think he felt that she was kinda naive and stupid. Remember "Despise Not the Handmaiden of the Lord?" Remember how he had to prod her to write as her prepped her to take over?
But you're right, the delusion that she's mama is going to have to be denounced, as well.
