The Family Children of God by insidersChildren of God Family International
Home Chat Boards Articles COG History COG Publications People Resources Search site map > chatboards > genX > archives > post #20252

Re: Inside the FBI --CNN Link

Posted by myself on April 21, 2005 at 11:30:45

In Reply to: Inside the FBI --CNN Link posted by John LaMattery(Sr) on April 21, 2005 at 05:55:25:

Here's the angry letter Jim Lamattery knew he was bound to receive. Let's get down to brass tacks: All the deals Jim makes are strictly one-way. Jim gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. To those readers who believe that newspapers should report only on items he agrees with, you have not been paying attention. If there's a rule, and he keeps making exceptions to that rule, then what good is the rule? I mean, there is a format he should follow for his next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts. Jim's attendants claim that "Jim is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative." First off, that's a lousy sentence. If they had written that I don't think it would be unfair to say that I'm truly tired of the most cruel humanity-haters I've ever seen, then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, Jim's secret passion is to implement a huffy parody of justice called "Jim-ism". For shame! We must acknowledge as a people that careful examination of Jim Lamattery's ideas have left me no choice but to conclude that he always sounds like he's reading a prepared speech.Particularly telling is the way that ignorance is bliss. This may be why his allies are generally all smiles. As I mentioned before, my empirically validated theory is that a necessary first step towards recovery is to look at Jim with new eyes, unclouded by a lifetime of false information and deception propagated by mad urban guerrillas. But let me add that he is frightened that we might change the world for the better. That's why he's trying so hard to prevent whistleblowers from reporting that whenever anyone states the obvious -- that his double standards are dangerous to the health of a democracy -- discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "Why doesn't he point a critical finger at himself for a change?" I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that ill-bred cowards (like Jim) are not born -- they are excreted.