|
In Reply to: Re: Question to JLM posted by Jim LaMattery on December 08, 2005 at 11:17:23:
Jim, this is a pretty strong statement. You say,
"Some of these communications could be used to prove perjury on the part of Peter and Maria in a future lawsuit, so it is important to handle them carefully, and know who I'm talking to."
This sounds like serious stuff. But my guess is still that it's nothing new. Peter and Maria have perjured himself dozens of times over in admitting, denying and denying again. The strongest evidence is already out there, like the renoucing of Berg's sexual policies in the British court case, then Maria coming out with the Maria Monologues privately after, saying they lied to the court (i.e. "had to go along with them, but we REALLY believe...")
