|
In Reply to: The latest drama from Jim LaMattery posted by Monger on August 20, 2006 at 00:13:53:
Thank you so much guys, for taking the time to explain so generously to Mr. LaMattery his legal homework. You guys rock!
I found it humorous that Jim had it "confirmed" that Ed and I are one and the same - No offense Ed, but you're way too computer-illiterate to be a webmaster - and yet needed to fish for a confirmation. As anyone who is anyone who has been online for a while knows, Ed and I are two very different people, and other webmasters like Jules and Joseph in particular, who have access logs could certainly verify that.
If I recall correctly, this rumor that WC=Ed was started by "Researcher" - the one who posted those false accusations against Sam Ajemian by splicing together and falsifying California law, who then accused us of showing favoritism and protecting Sam Ajemian by deleting posts that were critical of him.
Once again, like about so many other things, Jim LaMattery is wrong.
