In Reply to: Re: To Jim LaMattery posted by Observer on April 24, 2005 at 12:21:52:
So, what you're saying is that the FBI did not want to publicise the investigation and told Jim so, but he went ahead and did it anyway?
All this crap about Jim working hand in hand with the FBI, and he is actually working against them. Some would say he is impeding their investigation -- what's the term Jim uses -- "obstructing justice"?
Way to go Jim -- a new day, a new low.